Skip to main content

Drought Assessment Special Report

  • Remote Monitoring Report
  • Angola
  • October 2013
Drought Assessment Special Report

Download the Report

  • Key Messages
  • Key Messages
    • Due to severe drought in most of the Southern Livestock, Millet, and Sorghum livelihood zone in early 2013, water availability, pasture conditions, and harvests are significantly below-average. In Namibe Province this is the second consecutive year of drought for many households. In both Namibe and Cunene livestock migration occurred earlier, involved more animals, more people, and more time than usual.

    • Given current conditions and expectations for average rainfall, poor households in Namibe and Cunene are expected to be Stressed (Phase 2) until harvests arrive in March. In comparison, access to water and livestock conditions are better in Cuando Cubango, and as a result of assistance, Minimal (IPC phase 1!) acute food insecurity outcomes are expected over the same period. 

    • The Angolan government is providing assistance to the affected populations, which is sufficient to meet minimum needs. However, the impact of the food assistance is more effective in Cuando Cubango, where households are recieving regular and complete rations; assistance to households in Namibe and Cunene is less effective in improving food access because of distribution irregularties. 

       

      Please click the download button at the top of the page for the full report.

    In remote monitoring, a coordinator typically works from a nearby regional office. Relying on partners for data, the coordinator uses scenario development to conduct analysis and produce monthly reports. As less data may be available, remote monitoring reports may have less detail than those from countries with FEWS NET offices. Learn more about our work here.

    Get the latest food security updates in your inbox Sign up for emails

    The information provided on this Website is not official U.S. Government information and does not represent the views or positions of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. Government.

    Jump back to top