Mise à jour sur la sécurité alimentaire

Staple food prices increasing more rapidly than expected

Avril 2016

Avril - Mai 2016

South Sudan April 2016 Food Security Projections for April to May

Juin - Septembre 2016

South Sudan April 2016 Food Security Projections for June to September

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

Pays de présence:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Pays suivis à distance:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

Messages clés

  • Large areas of Greater Upper Nile (GUN) continue to experience Emergency (IPC Phase 4) acute food insecurity. Households in these areas are facing an increased risk of malnutrition and excess mortality. In Unity State, it is expected that a small population of households are in Catastrophe (IPC Phase 5). Crisis (IPC Phase 3) acute food insecurity persists across larger areas of the country as many households face significant difficulty meeting their basic food needs.

  • Staple food prices have increased considerably as a result of local currency depreciation, below-average 2015 production, fuel shortages that have increased transportation costs, and continued conflict that has reduced market functioning. High prices continue to limit household food access, especially among market-dependent poor households in urban areas. In Juba, the price of sorghum in March was 400 percent above the five-year average.

  • Conflict is expected to reduce below 2015-levels with the formation of the Transitional Government of National Unity. However, it is possible isolated security incidents and tensions will continue between government forces and armed groups not affiliated with parties to the peace agreement. Additionally, tensions arising from disagreement over cantonment areas in Greater Bahr el Ghazal and Greater Equatoria are likely to continue. 

Current Situation

Throughout April, sporadic attacks have continued in Western Bahr el Ghazal, Western Equatoria, and parts of Unity and Upper Nile State, despite the peace deal signed by the Government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army in Opposition (SPLA-IO) in August 2015. However, Jonglei and most parts of Upper Nile have remained relatively calm in recent months compared to last year. With the recent return and swearing in of First Vice President Riek Machar, it is assumed conflict will further reduce with the formation of the Transitional Government of National Unity. It is possible, however, that clashes will continue between government forces and other armed groups not affiliated with parties to the peace deal. Additionally, tensions arising from disagreement over cantonment areas in the Greater Bahr el Ghazal and Greater Equatoria areas are likely to continue.

Although the South Sudanese Pound (SSP) has appreciated from 41 SSP/USD in March to 31 SSP/USD in April, macroeconomic conditions remain very poor. The scarcity of foreign reserves and depreciation of the SSP has reduced the quantity that traders are able to import and put many out of business. FEWS NET’s cross border monitoring indicates that sorghum imported from Uganda, the largest staple exporter to South Sudan, in the first quarter of 2016 was approximately three times lower than the first quarter of 2015. Similarly, sorghum imports from Ethiopia were 84 percent lower in the first quarter of 2016 than 2015.

In March, prices of staple foods remained exorbitantly high, increasing more rapidly than previously expected. Fuel shortages continue to increase the cost of transporting food to interior markets, reducing market supply and contributing to high food prices. According to the National Bureau of Statistics, the South Sudan annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by 245.2 percent from March 2015 to March 2016. Over the same time period, the price of sorghum increased 446 percent in Juba, 408 percent in Wau, and 392 percent in Aweil. Compared to the five-year average, sorghum prices in March were 446, 507, and 571 percent above-average in Juba, Wau, and Aweil, respectively.

The start of first season rainfall was mixed in the bimodal areas of Western and Central Equatoria. A timely onset of rainfall was observed in April in Western Equatoria, but conflict-related displacement is limiting farmers’ access to planting their fields and below-average production is expected for some poor households. Rainfall has been erratic in Central Equatoria in April, but is expected to become fully established in May. The June to September main rainy season in most parts of South Sudan is forecast to be near-average tending to above-average in terms of total cumulative rainfall.

Livestock body conditions continue to deteriorate seasonally as the dry season progresses. Most livestock in GUN have been kept near homesteads due to the threat of cattle raiding and general insecurity. As a result, households have some access to livestock products, although at seasonally low levels. An assessment conducted in March by DCA, Nile Hope, and LWF found that livestock in Panyikang and Nasir counties of Upper Nile are currently grazing along Lol and Sobat rivers near homesteads, similarly allowing households access to milk. Livestock from Bor in Jonglei State have been migrated to Central and Eastern Equatoria where the security situation is relatively calm. Livestock owners in Nasir County were reportedly bartering their livestock for cereal at the border with Ethiopia.

Updated Assumptions

The current situation has not affected most of the assumptions used in South Sudan Food Security Outlook for February to September 2016. However, the following assumption has been updated:

  • An analysis in March has indicated that staple food prices have increased more rapidly than expected, further reducing purchasing power as wage and livestock prices are not increasing in line with food inflation. Prices are expected to remain well above average.

Projected Outlook through September 2016

During the May to July lean season, many households will rely mostly on fish, livestock products, and wild foods. In the bimodal areas of Western and Central Equatoria, the first season harvest in July is expected to improve food consumption, although the harvest is likely to be slightly below average in in both areas.

In both Greater Bahr el Ghazal and Greater Upper Nile, given the high cost of importing, a relatively low level of commercial stocks were prepositioned in markets in preparation for the rainy season, when road access will limit trade. As a result, it is expected market stocks will be depleted earlier than usual. Of particular concern are Aweil North and Aweil East in northern Bahr el Ghazal where it is expected that significant populations will deteriorate to Emergency (IPC Phase 4) during the May to July lean season when wild foods are less available and better-off households have less stocks to share. However, food security is expected to improve slightly in August/September when fishing becomes more available, green consumption begins, and livestock productivity increases.

Large areas of GUN are expected to remain in Emergency (IPC Phase 4) acute food security, with households facing an increased risk of malnutrition and excess mortality. In central Unity State, specifically in Koch, Mayendit, Guit, and Leer where food access has been very limited, an increasing number of households are expected to move into Emergency (IPC Phase 4). A smaller population of worst-affected household in central Unity are expected to be in Catastrophe (IPC Phase 5).  In Greater Equatoria, Jonglei, and Greater Bahr el Ghazal, Crisis (IPC Phase 3) acute food insecurity is expected to persist, and households will continue to experience food consumption gaps in light of reduced market supplies, high market prices, and limited income.

À Propos de ce Rapport

Cette mise à jour sur la sécurité alimentaire est un rapport mensuel sur les conditions actuelles et des changements sur les perspectives projetées de l'insécurité alimentaire dans ce pays. Il met à jour les Perspectives sur la sécurité alimentaires de FEWS NET. Pour en savoir plus sur notre travail, cliquez ici.

About FEWS NET

Le Réseau des systèmes d’alerte précoce contre la famine est l’un des principaux prestataires d’alertes précoces et d’analyses de l’insécurité alimentaire. Constitué par l’USAID en 1985 pour aider les décideurs à planifier pour les crises humanitaires, FEWS NET fournit des analyses factuelles  concernant quelque 35 pays. Les membres des équipes de mise en œuvre incluent la NASA, la NOAA, le département américain de l ‘Agriculture (USDA) et le gouvernement des États-Unis (USGS), de même que Chemonics International Inc. et Kimetrica. Vous trouverez d’autres informations sur notre travail.

  • USAID Logo
  • USGS Logo
  • USDA Logo
  • NASA Logo
  • NOAA Logo
  • Kilometra Logo
  • Chemonics Logo