Nigeria

País donde estamos presentes
Marzo 2021

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Would likely be at least one phase worse without current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

Presence countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Remote monitoring
countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Se estima que seria al menos una fase peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

Países presenciales:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Países de monitoreo remoto:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

Pays de présence:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Pays suivis à distance:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

Países com presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Países sem presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

Marzo - Mayo 2021

Junio - Septiembre 2021

CIF v3.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Concentración de personas desplazadas
Se estima que seria al menos una fase peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.
Mensajes clave
  • Despite the recent slight increase in both crude oil production and international prices, most macroeconomic indicators remain poor. The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) indicates the annual inflation rate rose from 16.46 percent in January to 17.33 percent in February. Similarly, the NGN depreciated to 484 NGN/USD on the parallel market in late March, while the official exchange rate remains relatively stable at 380 NGN/USD. Overall, this is driving increases in staple food prices, lower household purchasing power, and reduced food access. Moreover, the unemployment rate increase by over five percent from Quarter two to four in 2020, likely decreasing remittances for some poor households.

  • Conflict in the northeast continues at high levels, driving displacement and constraining household access to food and income. Displaced and conflict-affected households rely mainly on firewood sales, petty trade, and construction labor to earn little income. Atypically high staple food prices and lower than average purchasing power is resulting in reduced food access. Humanitarian food assistance delivery from December to January in the northeast has decreased. Available information suggests that while assistance has decreased, displaced households in some camps are still able to meet their food needs. As a result, Stressed! (IPC Phase 2!) outcomes are present in some areas where displaced populations are located. Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcomes are expected to persist in much of the northeast, with inaccessible areas facing Emergency (IPC Phase 4). Famine (IPC Phase 5) is possible in the event there is a dramatic uptick or shift in conflict that limits household access to typical food and income sources and humanitarian assistance for a prolonged period of time.

  • While conflict events have occurred across the Northeast in early 2021, the recent conflict in Dikwa has been the most significant. An assessment conducted by IOM in November 2020 found over 76,200 IDP were present in Dikwa. Also, according to IOM, conflict in early March in Dikwa displaced nearly 27,900 individuals and drove considerable displacement towards Ajiri ward in neighboring Mafa LGA. Other displaced persons fled to adjacent LGAs as well as Maiduguri. Additionally, humanitarian actors have significantly reduced activities in this area; however, some assistance delivery started in late March to over 63,000 people in Dikwa.  Of particular concern are populations still in areas of Dikwa who did not engage in the agricultural season or lost food stocks due to fires or looting by the insurgents.

  • The multidimensional conflict in the northwest and north-central parts of Nigeria continues to increase. Additionally, kidnapping for ransom has also increased, both of which are driving increased displacement. Between March 15 and 21, banditry and farmer/herder conflicts in Chikun, Kauru, and Birnin Gwari LGAs of Kaduna State and Safana and Kankara LGAs of Katsina State affected 391 individuals, including 27 injuries and 34 fatalities. These households remain displaced and unable to engage in typical livelihood activities and have resorted to petty trading and unskilled labor to earn little income, depending mainly on markets to access food. Combined with atypical staple prices and below-average income, most conflict-affected households face Crisis (IPC Phase 3) and Stressed (IPC Phase 2) outcomes.

  • A normal to slightly early onset of the rainy season has been observed in bimodal areas. In non-conflict affected areas in the north, dry season cultivation and land preparation activities are underway as normal. These households are also consuming own cultivated staples, while those dependent on markets are also accessing food normally. As a result, most households are facing Minimal (IPC Phase 1). Exceptions are households affected by conflict, and urban poor households continued to be impacted by the indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, with below-average access to income-earning activities, is expected to drive persistent low household income. As a result, some households are only able to meet basic food needs and are in Stressed (IPC Phase 2).

Food Security

Nigeria Food Security Classification (February 2021 - September 2021)

Current (February 2021) food security outcomes and forward-looking analysis representing the most likely food security outcomes for the near term (February 2021 - May 2021) and medium term (June 2021 - September 2021) periods.

Downloads

About FEWS NET

La Red de Sistemas de Alerta Temprana contra la Hambruna es un proveedor de primera línea de alertas tempranas y análisis sobre la inseguridad alimentaria. Creada por la USAID en 1985 con el fin de ayudar a los responsables de tomar decisiones a prever crisis humanitarias, FEWS NET proporciona análisis asentados en evidencia sobre unos 35 países. Entre los integrantes del equipo ejecutor figuran la NASA, NOAA, USDA y el USGS, así como Chemonics International Inc. y Kimetrica. Lea más sobre nuestro trabajo.

  • USAID Logo
  • USGS Logo
  • USDA Logo
  • NASA Logo
  • NOAA Logo
  • Kilometra Logo
  • Chemonics Logo