Uganda

País donde estamos presentes
Noviembre 2021

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Would likely be at least one phase worse without current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

Presence countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Remote monitoring
countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Se estima que seria al menos una fase peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

Países presenciales:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Países de monitoreo remoto:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

Pays de présence:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Pays suivis à distance:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

Países com presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Países sem presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

Noviembre 2021 - Enero 2022

Febrero - Mayo 2022

CIF v3.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Parques y reservas
Se estima que seria al menos una fase peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
Concentración de personas desplazadas
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.
Mensajes clave
  • In bimodal areas, cumulative below-average second season rainfall - ranging from 70 to 85 percent of average since October and only 30 to 60 percent of normal rainfall in the first half of November - is likely to negatively affect the maturing stage of most cereals and legumes. As a result of the poorly distributed rainfall, the availability of green harvests is less than usual. Pasture and water availability is also slightly below average in localized areas in the southwest cattle corridor and parts of the central zone. Although harvests will be slightly below average, increased food availability in December is still expected to support Minimal (IPC Phase 1) outcomes in most rural areas. However, Stressed (IPC Phase 2) outcomes are likely in parts of northern Uganda where this poor harvest will be the second consecutive below-average harvest and poor households are likely facing difficulty meeting their non-food needs amid below-average access to crops for consumption and sale.  

  • In Karamoja, Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcomes persist in the districts of the Central Sorghum and Livestock livelihood zone following the significantly below-average seasonal harvests in 2021 that are not expected to replenish typical household food stocks. Minimal harvests and safety net programs by WFP are contributing to food access, but poor households continue to face slight to moderate food consumption gaps given the low harvests alongside below-average and declining firewood/charcoal-to-cereal terms of trade. Livestock thefts and related insecurity is expected to limit income from animal sales for some, as well as the movement of livestock during the dry season. The lean season is expected to arrive earlier than usual (by December).

  • Seasonally declining food stocks at market and household levels, anticipation of a consecutive delayed and slightly below average national production, the holiday season, speculation of schools reopening, and the rising global oil prices, have led to rising prices for produce such as sorghum, cooking bananas, cassava, and sweet potatoes. Prices were above last year and five-year average levels in September and October. However, bean retail prices were about 14 percent below the five-year average. Exports to deficit countries in the region are expected to increase in 2021/22 despite below-average harvests in many countries and below-average Q3 quantities compared to Q2. Nonetheless, staple exports to Kenya and South Sudan were higher in Q1 and Q2 of 2021 compared to the Q1 and Q2 of 2020. Staple prices are likely to be higher than typical post-harvest levels in December and January by at least 10 percent.

  • According to UNHCR/OPM, Uganda hosts roughly 1,549,181 refugees mostly from South Sudan and DRC as of October 31. In early November, over 11,000 Congolese refugees crossed into Uganda through Bunagana and Kibaya border points fleeing insecurity and conflict in North Kivu’s Rutshuru territory. Despite closed borders, Uganda granted the refugees entry. Although below-average, harvests are contributing a proportion of total food needs for many refugee households. Furthermore, with humanitarian food assistance ranging from 40-70 percent of kilocalorie needs complementing some harvests and market purchases, most refugees are likely meeting their basic kilocalorie needs, though continue to face difficulty meeting their non-food needs. As a result, Stressed! (IPC Phase 2!) outcomes represent FEWS NET’s updated analysis at the area-level. Some refugees likely continue to face food consumption gaps even in the presence of humanitarian food assistance, though available evidence on acute malnutrition and mortality suggests that the population facing consumption deficits in the presence of food assistance is likely under the 20 percent that defines area-level classifications. Key to note is that – in the absence of food assistance - refugees would face consumption gaps indicative of at least Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcomes.

Food Security

Uganda Food Security Classification (November 2021 - May 2022)

Near term (November 2021 - January 2022) food security outcomes and forward-looking analysis representing the most likely food security outcomes for medium term (February 2022 - May 2022) periods.

Downloads

Medios de vida

Livelihoods Zone Narrative

Livelihood Zone Map

About FEWS NET

La Red de Sistemas de Alerta Temprana contra la Hambruna es un proveedor de primera línea de alertas tempranas y análisis sobre la inseguridad alimentaria. Creada por la USAID en 1985 con el fin de ayudar a los responsables de tomar decisiones a prever crisis humanitarias, FEWS NET proporciona análisis asentados en evidencia sobre unos 35 países. Entre los integrantes del equipo ejecutor figuran la NASA, NOAA, USDA y el USGS, así como Chemonics International Inc. y Kimetrica. Lea más sobre nuestro trabajo.

  • USAID Logo
  • USGS Logo
  • USDA Logo
  • NASA Logo
  • NOAA Logo
  • Kilometra Logo
  • Chemonics Logo