East Africa

May 2020

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Would likely be at least one phase worse without current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

Presence countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Remote monitoring
countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Se estima que seria al menos una fase peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

Países presenciales:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Países de monitoreo remoto:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

Pays de présence:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Pays suivis à distance:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

Países com presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Países sem presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

April - May 2020

June - September 2020

IPC v3.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

Presence countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
National Parks/Reserves
Remote monitoring
countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without current or programmed humanitarian assistance
Not mapped
Concentration of displaced people – hover over maps to view food security phase classifications for camps in Somalia, Sudan, and Uganda.
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.
FEWS NET continues to monitor food security conditions in areas mapped in gray.
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.
Key Messages
  • In the nine countries that FEWS NET covers in the East Africa region, inclusive of Yemen, FEWS NET estimates that the peak number of people facing Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse outcomes in 2020 will be 25-30 percent higher than the peak population estimate prior to the onset of COVID-19. The economic and health impacts of COVID-19 are exacerbating poor macroeconomic conditions and contributing to upward pressure on staple food prices, while the concurrent floods, desert locust, and protracted conflict are negatively affecting household food and income sources. Movement restrictions to limit the spread of COVID-19 are simultaneously restricting access to income sources, especially among poor urban and displaced households, who are highly dependent on daily labor income in the informal sector to purchase food. As the number of cases rises, COVID-19 is also likely to affect the food security of at-risk households who may lose income or switch expenditures to health care costs if infected.

  • In April and May, flooding and desert locusts adversely affected seasonal crop and livestock production in several areas dependent on the March to May rains. The floods also caused loss of household assets, disrupted livelihoods activities, and constrained household access to markets or food assistance. According to OCHA and government sources, the floods have affected more than 1.8 million people, including at least 845,000 people that have been displaced in Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Rwanda, and Uganda as of late May. Several thousands of acres of crops have been destroyed and livestock lost, while water- and vector-borne disease incidence is rising in flood-prone and riverine areas. While pasture and crop damage from the desert locust infestation has been limited by on-going control measures and the heavy rains, current and projected climatic and vegetation conditions remain conducive for breeding and development in Ethiopia, Somalia, and central and northwestern Kenya, while swarms are likely to migrate through northern and eastern South Sudan to Sudan.

  • Household access to food is also constrained by rising food prices, particularly in Sudan, South Sudan, and Ethiopia. Staple food prices were 5-25 percent above the five-year average in urban and some rural areas of Kenya in April, while rice and wheat flour prices rose by as much as 40 percent in some northeastern and central markets in Somalia in May. In Sudan and South Sudan, the price of sorghum and millet in key reference markets was 400-470 percent and 100-400 percent, respectively, above the five-year average in April. Similarly, maize and sorghum prices in Ethiopia were 50-105 percent above the five-year average in April. Poor households are expected to face increasing difficulty purchasing their minimum food needs prior to the July/August harvests in bimodal areas and prior to the September/October harvests in Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Sudan.

  • Food insecurity remains pervasive among large populations of internally displaced persons and refugees in East Africa. Conflict and floods have internally displaced an estimated 11.6 people in Burundi, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, and Yemen and about 4.48 million people from these countries are refugees living in settlements in Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan, Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania, based on UNHCR data. In April, ration cuts were implemented in Yemen and Uganda, respectively, including a 50 percent reduction for local and displaced populations in northern Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen due to the restrictive operating environment and a 30 percent reduction for refugees in Uganda due to insufficient funding. As these populations have limited capacities to access food and income sources and are primarily dependent on humanitarian assistance, the reductions in food assistance are likely to lead to Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or Emergency (IPC Phase 4) outcomes.

  • Overall, more than 40 million people in East Africa and Yemen are likely facing Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or Emergency (IPC Phase 4) outcomes. Further, a risk of Famine (IPC Phase 5) persists in South Sudan and Yemen. The number of people and severity of food insecurity is likely to increase during the June to September period, which coincides with the unimodal lean season, due to multiple, concurrent shocks and an atypical increase in poor, urban population that is experiencing Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse outcomes due to the economic impacts of COVID-19. A scale up in emergency humanitarian food assistance is needed to prevent the occurrence of food consumption gaps and/or depletion of livelihood assets among affected populations.

Livelihoods

About FEWS NET

The Famine Early Warning Systems Network is a leading provider of early warning and analysis on food insecurity. Created by USAID in 1985 to help decision-makers plan for humanitarian crises, FEWS NET provides evidence-based analysis on approximately 30 countries. Implementing team members include NASA, NOAA, USDA, USGS, and CHC-UCSB, along with Chemonics International Inc. and Kimetrica.
Learn more About Us.

Link to United States Agency for International Development (USAID)Link to the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) FEWS NET Data PortalLink to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Link to National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Earth ObservatoryLink to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Weather Service, Climage Prediction CenterLink to the Climate Hazards Center - UC Santa BarbaraLink to KimetricaLink to Chemonics