Madagáscar

País com presença
Novembro 2019

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Would likely be at least one phase worse without current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national food security partners.
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

IPC 2.0 Acute Food Insecurity Phase

Presence countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3: Crisis
4: Emergency
5: Famine
Remote monitoring
countries:
1: Minimal
2: Stressed
3+: Crisis or higher
Would likely be at least one phase worse without
current or programmed humanitarian assistance
FEWS NET Remote Monitoring countries use a colored outline to represent the highest IPC classification in areas of concern.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Se estima que seria al menos una fase peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
La manera de clasificación que utiliza FEWS NET es compatible con la CIF. Un análisisque es compatible con la CIF sigue los protocolos fundamentales de CIF pero nonecesariamente refleja el consenso de los socios nacionales en materia de seguridad alimentaria.
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurida d Alimentaria Aguda

Países presenciales:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3: Crisis
4: Emergencia
5: Hambruna
Países de monitoreo remoto:
1: Minimo
2: Acentuada
3+: Crisis o peor
Se estima que seria al menos una fase
peor sin ayuda humanitaria actual o programada
Para los países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza un contorno de color en el mapa CIF que representa la clasificación más alta de CIF en las áreas de preocupación.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
La manière de classification que FEWS NET utilise est compatible avec l’IPC. Une analyse qui est compatible avec l’IPC suit les principaux protocoles de l’IPC mais ne reflète pas nécessairement le consensus des partenaires nationaux en matière de sécurité alimentaire.
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

IPC 2.0 Phase d'Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë

Pays de présence:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Urgence
5: Famine
Pays suivis à distance:
1: Minimale
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pire
Serait probablement pire, au moins une phase, sans
l'assistance humanitaire en cours ou programmée
Pour les pays suivis à distance par FEWS NET, un contour coloré est utilisé pour représenter la classification de l’IPC la plus élevée dans les zones de préoccupation.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a CIF. A análise compatível com a CIF segue os protocolos fundamentais da CIF mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

CIF 2.0 Fase de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda Baseado

Países com presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3: Crise
4: Emergência
5: Fome
Países sem presença:
1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa CIF para representar a classificação mais alta da CIF nas áreas de preocupação.

Novembro 2019 - Janeiro 2020

Map of Projected food security outcomes, October 2019 to January 2020: Minimal (IPC Phase 1) in most of the country, Stressed (IPC Phase 2) in the far south: parts of Atsimo Andrefana, Androy, and Anosy; Stressed (IPC Phase 2!) in Androy, and Crisis (IPC Phase 3) in the south of Atsimo-Andrefana

Fevereiro - Maio 2020

Map of Projected food security outcomes, February to May 2020: Minimal (IPC Phase 1) in most of the country, Stressed (IPC Phase 2) in the far south: parts of Atsimo Andrefana, Androy, and Anosy; Stressed (IPC Phase 2!) in Androy, and Crisis (IPC Phase 3) in the south of Atsimo-Andrefana

Fases de Insegurança Alimentar Aguda baseadas em IPC v3.0

1: Minima
2: Stress
3+: Crise ou pior
Poderia ser pior sem a assistência
humanitária em vigor ou programad
A maneira de classificação que utiliza FEWS NET é compatível com a IPC. A análise compatível com a IPC segue os protocolos fundamentais da IPC mas não necessariamente reflete o consenso dos parceirosnacionais com respeito a segurança alimentar.
Para os países de Monitoreo Remoto, FEWS NET utiliza um contorno de cor no mapa IPC para representar a classificação mais alta da IPC nas áreas de preocupação.
As mensagens-chave
  • The rainy season has continued normally in the central highlands, allowing farmers to transplant water-fed rice and to sow upland rice, maize and pulses. Cropped area has increased in Vakinakaratra region and some maize crops are already ready to be harvested, with yields similar to last year. Rains are ongoing in the South but are cumulatively slightly below average, though enough to maintain normal development of cassava and maize crops.

  • Staple food access has remained stable in most of Madagascar in recent months, which has been positive for poor household foods both in rural and urban areas, except in Vangaindrano where prices are increasing atypically. Overall, rice and tuber prices are near to below last year’s prices because of increased household and market stocks at the end of the post-harvest period following a generally good harvest. Their prices are also average to below average in most markets, except in main cities throughout the country andin Ampanihy and in Vangaindrano. Maize prices remain higher than last year and the 5-year average, except in Tsihombe, Beloha, Antsirabe and Morondava where prices are 10 to 30 percent below average. No maize sales are currently reported in Ambovombe.

  • Cattle herd sizes havestabilized andno excessive sales have been reported. Livestock are generally in good health with normal body conditions due to the availability of green pastureland. On average at end November, cattle are being sold at 700,000 MGA per head in Betioky, which shows an unexpected increase of 25 percent compared to September. Meanwhile, prices of small ruminants, which poor households will likely sell first when their food stocks are depleted stabilized at 55,000 MGA for a goat and 60,000 MGA for a sheep.

  • Supplies of certain necessities such as fuel, electricity and drinking water were interrupted in Antananarivo, and subsequently other provinces at the beginning of November creating panic and discontent among consumers. It did not affect prices, but the State has planned to directly import necessities such as rice, oil, flour and fuel through a company called State Procurement of Madagascar, which is a public limited company. The objective of this initiative is to stop the price fluctuation and speculation of some importers. The first imports are expected by the end of 2019.

  • Most poor and very poor households in Androy Semi-Arid Cassava, Maize and Livestock (MG 24) and in Mahafaly Plain: Cassava, Goats and Cattle (MG 23) will remain in Stressed (IPC Phase 2), except in Ampanihy where very poor and poor households remain in Crisis (IPC Phase 3) because they have not yet recovered from the previous poor season.. Increasing food prices in Vangaindrano havehad a significant impact on food access for poor households who are experiencing Stressed (IPC Phase 2) as a result. Other households throughout Madagascar remain in Minimal (IPC Phase 1) acute food insecurity.

Food Security Profiles

Tempo, Clima, e Agricultura

Calendário sazonal

Mercados e Comércio

Monitoria dos Preços
Boletins de Preços

Supply and Market Outlook

Enhanced Market Analysis

Formas de vida

Mapa das zonas de formas de vida

About FEWS NET

A Rede de Sistemas de AlertaPrecoce de Fome é líder na provisão de alertas precoces e análises relativas à insegurança alimentar. Estabelecida em 1985 com o fim de auxiliar os responsáveis pela tomada de decisões a elaborar planos para crises humanitárias, a FEWS NET provê análises baseadas em evidências em cerca de 35 países. Entre os membros implementadores refere-se a NASA , NOAA, USDA e o USGS, assim como a Chemonics International Inc. e a Kimetrica. Leia mais sobre o nosso trabalho.

  • USAID Logo
  • USGS Logo
  • USDA Logo
  • NASA Logo
  • NOAA Logo
  • Kilometra Logo
  • Chemonics Logo